Editorial Reviews. About the Author. David Sklansky is generally considered the number one Kindle Store; ›; Kindle eBooks; ›; Humor & Entertainment. Hold 'em Poker For Advanced Players by David Sklansky and Mason Malmuth The Theory of Poker is an expansion and total revision of the book Sklansky on. Discusses theories and concepts applicable to nearly every variation of the game , including five-card draw (high), seven-card stud, hold 'em, lowball draw, and.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Hindi|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
The Theory of Poker. Ву. David Sklansky. A product of Two Plus Two Publishing. FOURTH EDITION. SIXTH PRINTING. October Printing and Binding. Review of The Theory of Poker, written by David Sklansky. Includes synopsis and details on receiving this book free in the 2+2 poker bonus program. the theory of poker by david sklansky ebook, the theory of poker by david sklansky pdf, the theory of poker by david sklansky doc and the theory of poker by .
Excerpt from the Book Theory of Poker : Check Raising Check raising and slowplaying are two ways of playing a strong hand weakly to trap your opponents and win more money from them.
However, they are not identical. Check raising is checking your hand with the intention of raising on the same round after an opponent bets. Slowplaying, which we discuss in more detail in the next chapter, is playing your hand in a way that gives your opponents no idea of its strength.
It may be checking and then just calling an opponent who bets, or it may be calling a person who bets ahead of you. When you slowplay a hand, you are using deception to keep people in for a while in order to make your move in a later round.
Clearly, then, a hand you slowplay has to be much stronger than a hand with which you check raise. Check raising can drive opponents out and may even win the pot right there, while slowplaying gives opponents either a free card or a relatively cheap card.
They find it devious and deceitful and con sider people who use it to be less than well-bred. Well, check raising is devious and it is deceitful, but being devious and deceitful is precisely what one wants to be in a poker game, as is implied by the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.
Checking with the intention of raising is one way to do that. In a sense, check raising and slowplaying are the opposites of bluffing, in which you play a weak hand strongly.
If check raising and slowplaying were not permitted, the game of poker would lose just about as much as it would if bluffing and semi-bluffing were not permitted. Indeed the two types of play complement one another, and a good player should be adept at both of them.
The check raise is a powerful weapon. It is simply another tool with which a poker player practices his art.
Not allowing check raising in your home game is something like not allowing, say, the hit and run in a baseball game or the option pass in a football game. Without it poker loses a significant portion of its strategy, which, apart from winning money, is what makes the game fun.
I'm much more willing to congratulate an opponent for trapping me in a check raise than for drawing out on me on a call he shouldn't have made in the first place -- and if I am angry at anyone, it is at myself for falling into the trap. First, you must think you have the best hand, but not such a great hand that a slowplay would be proper.
Second, you must be quite sure someone behind you will bet if you check. Let's say on Fourth Street in seven-card stud someone bets with showing, and with you're getting sufficient pot odds to call.
Now on Fifth Street you catch a king to make kings up. Here you might check raise if you are pretty sure the player representing queens will bet.
This second condition--namely, that someone behind you will bet after you check--is very important. When you plan to check raise, you should always keep in mind that you could be making a serious, double-edged mistake if you check and no one bets behind you. You are giving a free card to opponents who would have folded your bet, and in addition you are losing a bet from those who would have called.
So you had better be very sure the check raise will work before you try it.
Let's say you have made kings up on Fifth Street, and the player representing queens is to your right. Kings up is a fairly good hand but not a great hand, and you'd like to get everybody out so they don't draw out on your two pair.
You check, and when the player with queens bets, you raise. You are forcing everyone else in the hand to call a double bet, the original bet and your immediate raise, and they will almost certainly fold.
Find another game. Jun 20, David rated it really liked it Recommends it for: poker probability crunchers, mathematicians, game theorists Shelves: non-fiction , owned , poker , gaming This was the first poker book recommended to me by an avid nonprofessional poker player who happens to be a mathematician.
David Sklansky is known on the poker circuit as "the Mathematician" and this book is considered one of the fundamental texts for serious students of the game, still recommended to new players despite its age. Probably its most important contribution to poker theory is Sklansky's Fundamental Theorem of Poker: Every time you play a hand differently from the way you would have pl This was the first poker book recommended to me by an avid nonprofessional poker player who happens to be a mathematician.
Probably its most important contribution to poker theory is Sklansky's Fundamental Theorem of Poker: Every time you play a hand differently from the way you would have played it if you could see all your opponents' cards, they gain; and every time you play your hand the same way you would have played it if you could see all their cards, they lose.
Conversely, every time opponents play their hands differently from the way they would have if they could see all your cards, you gain; and every time they play their hands the same way they would have played if they could see all your cards, you lose. This book takes a very mathematical approach to poker, though it does not dive deeply into probability theory or even more esoteric topics I have seen some poker math books cover.
But Sklansky gives very thorough coverage to some of the basic principles that every winning poker player must know: pot odds, implied odds, expected value, and how to calculate the probability of making a given hand, how to calculate the correct amount to put into a pot or when to fold based on your estimate of the probabilities of an opponent holding a range of various hands as well as the odds that he is bluffing , etc.
None of the math itself goes beyond very basic algebra, but there is a lot to calculate on the fly, which as Sklansky points out, even geniuses can't automatically do in the speed it takes to play a poker hand, especially as poker is a game of imperfect information. While the Theory of Poker expects you to become familiar with the necessary mathematical calculations to be a competent player and makes it pretty clear that no competent player isn't adept at them , Sklansky's advice is always aimed at trying to take advantage of the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.
It doesn't matter whether you win any given hand, or whether you get busted out of a game by a bad beat - it matters that you play correctly, which means a positive expectation over the long term. This is, of course, a masterwork, so why only 4 stars?