A Touchstone Book Published by Simon & Schuster New York • London •. Toronto • The most common response I have received to The Road Less Traveled in. ruthenpress.info The Motivation Manifesto The Road Less Traveled, 25th Anniversary Edition A NEW PSYCHOLOGY OF. Editorial Reviews. ruthenpress.info Review. By melding love, science, and religion into a primer on of the classic bestseller The Road Less Traveled, celebrated by The Washington Post as “not just a book but a spontaneous act of generosity.”.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Academic & Education|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
The Road Less Traveled. M. Scott Peck, M.D.. Discipline. With discipline - we can solve life's problems. By delaying gratification – confronting problems. The Road Less Traveled Summary is an ultra-popular psychological book by M. Scott Peck, aiming to redefine concepts as ubiquitous as. Download The Road Less Traveled By M. Scott Peck (PDF) apk for Android. One of the most best-selling books in the world.
I was at the crossroads, and I chose.
I have a Burch procedure scheduled on Monday. I began to read up on retropubic anatomy and the Burch procedure. In January , as I dissected into the retropubic space laparoscopically, I was amazed at what I could see!
It felt like that was the first time I had ever been in the retropubic space. I gasped when I saw the ischial spine the first time! The arcus tendineus fascia of pelvis, arcus tendineus fascia of levator ani, obturator neurovascular bundle, pubovesical muscledall those anatomic landmarks just jumped out before my eyes! I did my first laparoscopic Burch procedure strictly following the criteria of the modified Tanago technique, and the surgery was a great success.
With the success of the laparoscopic Burch procedure, I started to see more patients with pelvic organ prolapse. The procedure of vaginal sacrospinosus suspension for Presidential Address vaginal vault prolapse was very popular in the s which was greatly promoted by the late Dr. David Nichols in Boston. Because I could readily identify the ischial spine and coccyeal muscle laparoscopically, I decided to perform laparoscopic sacrospinosus ligament suspension for vaginal vault prolapse shortly after my successful laparoscopic Burch operation.
Unfortunately, the laparoscopic sacrospinosus suspension did not turn out to be as good as I would have expected. It took too long to do the procedure on both sides.
A couple of my patients had severe buttock pain develop after surgery and required a second surgery to replace the suspension stitches to relieve the pain.
I eventually gave it up. Back in my residency days in Chicago, we performed vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension exclusively for our patients with vaginal vault prolapse with excellent long-term results. I still remember, as a junior resident assisting the procedure, on entering the cul-de-sac, that I had to hold the bladder straight up toward the operating room ceiling with a right angle Heaney retractor.
One time during the surgery, my attending asked me whether I had ever felt the ureter. I began to sweat, and my heart raced. We were taught to place suspension stitches up to the level of ischial spine, and we were instructed to tug the tissue with the needle still in it to ensure that we indeed had the uterosacral ligament. We were told that when we have the uterosacral ligament, we could actually move the whole patient!
We were also instructed to pay particular attention to the angle of the needle. When we place the uterosacral ligament stitches, the needle has to be horizontaldit can never be more than degrees. This will prevent catching the ureter, we were told. As I became more proficient in laparoscopic dissection, I had a strong desire to see what the uterosacral ligament actually looks like, and I wanted to see its relationship to the ureter, so I dissected it out laparoscopically, and then I tested its strength in a fresh cadaver when I got the chance.
I used 0-Vicryl sutured through the uterosacral ligament about 2 cm medial to the ischial spine and hooked the suture to the scale to test the strength of the uterosacral ligament on the fresh cadaver. The suture broke at about 17 pounds, but the uterosacral ligament did not tear. I then used 1-Vicryl double looped through the uterosacral ligament at the same site and again hooked it to the scale. I had one of my assistants hold the cadaver while another assistant tested the strength of the uterosacral ligament.
This double-looped 1-Vicyl broke at 38 pounds, and again the uterosacral ligament did not tear. This experiment greatly enhanced my confidence in the strength of the uterosacral ligament, which I have been using for my suspension procedures with excellent results. The video of this experiment has been shown at my AAGL postgraduate course many times.
The Road Less Traveled was an exciting road, but not without bumps. Meanwhile, I was experiencing increasing suspicion from my OB-GYN colleagues who were trying their best to undermine operative laparoscopy, especially laparoscopic hysterectomy!
When asked by their patients, they would respond by saying that this was an experimental procedure or that their particular condition was not amenable to this type surgery. They began a crusade to prevent me from continuing. Suddenly one day about 4 months after I started to do laparoscopic hysterectomy, the OB-GYN department chair at our community hospital sent me a letter notifying me that I did not have the privilege for such a dangerous and experimental procedure and thus would no longer be permitted to continue.
Nevertheless, I was informed that if a patient sued me because of complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy, I could expect my OB-GYN colleagues to be more than willing to testify against me. I knew that if local colleagues testified against me, I would be accused of practicing medicine that deviated from community standards. Scott Peck PDF 1. Update on: Android Accessibility Suite 7.
BaBe - Baca Berita Beat Conductor AnonyTun 8. Opera News 6. Petz 1. Pet shop online. Pooking - Billiards City 2. Termux 0. Clash Royale 2. Without FCE—as without our children—I would be a very stupid m a n. But if we cannot capture or measure God. But t h e r e are e n o u g h hints a b o u t h u m a n spiritual behav- ior to constitute a science of sorts.
Such people t e n d to be quite intelligent. T h e p e r s o n with a sacred consciousness. T h e individual with a secu- lar consciousness essentially thinks t h a t he is t h e c e n t e r of t h e universe. So part of the "science" of G o d is n o t only to consider that which is u n e x p l a i n a b l e to materialists. In h i s classic w o r k The Varieties of Reli- gious Experience. For that reason. Di- mensions of the Christian Experience Gifts for the Journey is t h e o n l y specifically C h r i s t i a n b o o k I've e v e r w r i t t e n.
Stages o f Faith. With m i n o r exceptions. Never- theless. T h e r e are some who worry that categorizing people in. T h e y are comfortable with t h e mystery of t h e sacred. P e o p l e i n this s t a g e a r e usually scientific-minded. On t h e l a m from his brother.
Something extraordinary then happens. But finally. In t h e sixteenth century. Is- rael includes t h e entirety of o u r struggling infant humanity. T h i s psychospiritual baggage is often unconstructive a n d unneces- sary. T h e results of that event were decidedly unpleasant. Accord- ing to the unwritten contract. As I have already n o t e d. T h a n k s to the secularization of education. Piaget's stages of cognitive d e v e l o p m e n t. Nihilism suggests that there's no u n s e e n o r d e r to things.
To teach values is to suggest that things do matter. H e r mother. A l t h o u g h mischievous at times. But only recently are we b e g i n n i n g to see the limitations of t h e Age of Reason. N o u n s are categories. Yet i t exists. W h e n we parted at the Minneapolis airport. To be perfectly h o n e s t. Some- w h a t e x p e r i e n c e d with t h e Holy Spirit's capacity for persis- tence.
Creator of the whole universe would take time o u t to go run- n i n g with m e! This time I did not shake my head. I was i n no hurry.
I h a d never read the Book of Daniel. I n t h e first draft. This is inevitable. T o utilize d r e a m s effectively. Most with either a fundamentalist.
B u t h o w a r e souls different from egos? F o r m a n y secularists. Earlier I defined the soul as "a God-created. In this respect. T h e latter explanation I can live w i t h. O n e of the biggest differences between the soul a n d the ego is that the ego is closer to the surface of w h o we are or be- lieve o u r s e l v e s t o b e. A l t h o u g h egos can be described in general. T h e s e parts are real. But exactly h o w the soul a n d e g o interact re- mains mysterious. But at t h e very least.
They are n o t a s h a m e d to be "softhearted". For t h o s e w h o a r e spiritually oriented. T h e deepest healing occurs not in the mind.
Beyond that. T h e most c o m m o n barriers include expectations. I t i s also noisy. T h i s i s when an extraordinary a m o u n t of healing and converting be- gins to o c c u r — n o w that no o n e is deliberately trying to convert or heal. It is a kind of peace. But the experience of having grown from emptiness leaves a l a s t i n g i m p r i n t.
Most p e o p l e think of prayer as simply "speaking to God. But what is prayer? This type of prayer is often r e f e r r e d to as con- templative prayer. A n d usually it is wordless. Rightly or wrongly. Although t h e r e is great virtue in b o t h public a n d formal prayer.
I think—is 'I believe. S o m e years ago. I h a d things reversed. Dreams that o n c e provided revelations seem to have dried u p. I believe. Gifts for the Journey. M i g h t G o d deliberately m a k e Herself inaccessible? It is conceivable. I s G o d sadistic? I t makes sense o n c e we stop thinking of G o d as omniscient. Insofar as G o d is a creator. An equally i m p o r t a n t a d d e n d u m has c o m e over the course of the past fifty years to be called process theology.
H e n c e perfection must be unchanging. Butterscotch sauce. I scratched my h e a d. A n d t h e closer to perfection we are. A n d if we see ourselves or o u r organizations suffering. It's alive. So take a n o t h e r inexplicable hu- m a n. We thirst because t h e r e is drink. But m a k e no mistake: True glory is ours only insofar as we s u b m i t ourselves to t h e true G o d. On the one hand. B u t t o a considerable extent I can choose to decently nurture or n o t n u r t u r e myself.
On the other.
God is unquestionably o u r creator. T h e c o n c e p t of "cocreatorship" a n d the responsibility it entails have b e c o m e quite p o p u l a r in theology in r e c e n t years. Concluded by commenting. Darling Lord: Note my words. You c r e a t e d me to be precise with words. Without intent. At thirteen I went to b o a r d i n g school. And an orchard where the neighbor's sheep Grazed.
A n d I knew my parents loved m e. Vaguely I recall a r g u i n g Your existence With my adolescent friends. To fashion.
It doesn't matter. Certainly by college. I do n o t m e a n I never withhold A piece of truth now a n d then. I cannot imagine Anything I could ever have d o n e To deserve Such kindness. There is nothing that compels me To find Your presence in sunrise or sunset.
A n d while I could choose To see Your h a n d in these matters. I knew a b o u t sociobiology a n d o t h e r Modern notions. It is n o t beyond me to imagine A wondrous accident. Famine and flood. Is it? This business of revelation. I cannot handle: And those coincidences Which might be merely amusing If they could be u n d e r s t o o d as such.
Of setting Yourself aside F o r t h e s a k e o f love. To Your namelessness. To Your a p p a r e n t absence W h e n I want Your presence. Utterly unpredictable. To Your unpredictability. Coming to me Whenever. W i t h gladness. To publicly acknowledge Your P e r s o n h o o d?
I am so slow. I d i d it myself.
I w a n t e d To be sophisticated. But You have a personality. As we are accustomed to think Of bodies. Most important. You a r e n o cipher. A personality definite b e y o n d o u r own. A personality vibrant beyond o u r imagination. I sense the awesome energy R e q u i r e d. I can only assume Y o u suffer so o v e r us all. But never have I sensed in You O n e s e c o n d o f despair.
You are. Your delight in Your creation seems constant. Unlike m e. Never threaten or punish. I do not know the boundaries Of your power. Having l o n g ago forever forsaken T h e capacity to destroy Anything.
Yet You a r e a G o d Of restraint. But never neuter. Each with u n i q u e limitations. You love variety. I c o u l d watch colonies of bacteria A n d w h o l e societies of viruses Intermingling. A n d from a single spot I can observe A h u n d r e d different plants.
But what impresses me most I s t h e variety o f h u m a n s. Forgive m e. Thirty-seven years ago. For my best friend. Somehow we m a d e it through. Although without it T h e r e would have b e e n nothing. Jim—a most extraordinary man—commented. I h a v e no i d e a What planet we're from But it seems to have b e e n The same one.
After a five-day m e e t i n g that he led. A decade ago. Again We take s o m e credit. T h e successes Seem the m o r e mysterious.
F a c i n g failures a n d enjoying T h e successes of o u r past. Like the old. Mostly We are looking forward. We look back. Colonized earth. I threw The book down on my bedclothes. I'm coming home. W h o Has not had the experience? Even a paintbrush. Civility Rediscovered New York: Bantam Books. A Fable of Faith. Reason and Discovery New York: Hyperion Books. A New Psychology of Love. Community Making and Peace New York: A Pilgrimage of Faith.
Harmony Books. San Francisco: HarperSan- Francisco. Love and Family At- lanta: Turner Publishing.
Princeton University Press. See TRLT. L o r d Tennyson. I take care to avoid stereotyping on the basis of color and racial connotations.
The Doctrine of the Trinity London: Nisbet and Co. Bollingen Series. Leonard Hodgson. Matthew Fox. Thus readers should view the word here symboli- cally. Psychology and Religion: West and East. The term implies our "dark" side. Collected Works of C. Paulist Press. I place quote marks around the word "dark" here because as I've become in- creasingly conscious of our cultural tendency to distort language. I wrote: Among its other imperfections. Guilford Press. October 2. See also Will and Spirit New York: The Lack of Group Consciousness.
Although I admire this work immensely. I would delete "science. I take some issue with Lewis. I Corinthians The sense of entitlement to peace is discussed in ISOS. Genesis Ascent of the Mountain. Flight of the Dove New York: Masterpieces of Religious Verse New York: I am indebted to Frederick Buechner for bringing the meaning of this story home to me in his superb book of sermons. The Magnificent Defeat New York: John About the Author M.
Box Ridgefield. Flag for inappropriate content. Related titles. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Scott Peck, M. T h e discipline to discern what we are or M. Documents Similar To M. Christian Whamond. Jawad Ur Rehman Bhutta. Simon and Schuster. Miguel Davilla. Maria Lupu. Oana Curpas. Sunil K Sonare. Mohit Sharma. Natalie Rudolph. Saranjit Kaur. Diana Maria Georgescu. Giniti Harcum El Bey.
Maurizio Pieroni. Mariana Margarita Pando. More From Gloria Mariz Ang. Gloria Mariz Ang. Popular in Belief. Son Tran. Abu Daoud. Alban Aliu. Anonymous cGWekO0B. Patrick Finn. InterVarsity Press Samples.