Laurence Gardner - Bloodline of the Holy Grail - The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed. [Laurence Gardner] Genesis of the Grail Kings--The Explosive Story of the Ancient Bloodline. Laurence Gardner-Genesis of the Grail Kings_ The Explosive Story of Genetic Cloning and the Ancient. From our web page at: ruthenpress.info From a lecture presented by. Sir Laurence Gardner, Kt St Gm, KCD. Author of Bloodline of the Holy Grail. The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed by Laurence Gardner. The time- honoured quest for the Holy Grail has been referred to by some as the 'ultimate quest'.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Fiction & Literature|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
From royal and suppressed archives comes documented proof of the heritage of Jesus in the West and the long awaited discovery of the Holy Grail. In fulfilling. Bloodline of the Holy Grail has been described as The Book of Messianic Descent and it carries the subtitle The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed. This of. [Free download] Bloodline of The Holy Grail: The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed. Bloodline of The DOC | *audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF | ePub.
Messianic marriages were always conducted in two stages. The first the anointing in Luke was the legal commitment to wedlock, while the second the later anointing in Matthew, Mark and John was the cementing of the contract.
Dynastic heirs such as Jesus were expressly required to perpetuate their lines.
Marriage was essential, but community law protected the dynasts against marriage to women who proved barren or kept miscarrying.
This protection was provided by the three-month pregnancy rule. Miscarriages would not often happen after that term, subsequent to which it was considered safe enough to complete the marriage contract. When anointing her husband at that stage, the Messianic bride was said to be anointing him for burial, as confirmed in the Gospels.
After the second Bethany anointing , the Gospels relate that Jesus said: But did the Christian Church authorities honour Mary Magdalene and speak of this act as a memorial? She is still revered as such by many today, but the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers: Hence, she is the guardian of the sacred Bloodline of the Holy Grail.
There is much in the Gospels that we do not presume to be there because we are never encouraged to look beyond a superficial level.
However, we have been aided greatly in this regard in recent years by the Dead Sea Scrolls and by the extraordinary research of Australian theologian Dr Barbara Thiering. The Scrolls not only explain the offices of the Messiah of Israel; they tell about the council of twelve delegate apostles appointed to preside over specific aspects of government and ritual. In turn, this leads to a greater awareness of the apostles themselves through understanding their duties and community standing.
We now know that there are allegories within the Gospels: Also, we now know there was a particular jargon of the Gospel era , a jargon that would have been readily understood by readers of the time, embodying words that have been lost to later interpretation. The Gospels are full of such jargonistic words: When the Gospels were written in the 1 st century they were issued into a Roman-controlled environment and their content had to be disguised against Imperial scrutiny.
The information was often political, so it was coded and veiled. It was, in practice, no different to the coded information passed between members of oppressed groups throughout history, such as the documentation issued by latter-day Jews in Germany in the s and s.
Through our knowledge of this scribal cryptology, we can now determine dates and locations with very great accuracy. We can uncover many hidden meanings in the Gospels , to the extent that the miracles themselves take on a whole new context. They gained prominence because, in the prevailing political arena, they were thoroughly unprecedented actions which successfully flouted the law.
Let us consider the water and wine at Cana by following the story as it is told in the Bible, in contrast to its common pulpit portrayal.
Actually, if this was such an important miracle as Church teaching promotes one would rightly expect the account to appear in the other Gospels as well. What it says is: They were allowed only water - a purification ritual, as stated in John. The Ruler of the Feast made no comment whatsoever about any miracle; he simply expressed his amazement that the wine had turned up at that stage of the proceedings.
However, this event can be dated to the summer of AD 30, in the month equivalent to our modern June. First weddings were always held in the month of Atonement modern September and betrothal feasts were held three months before that.
In this particular instance, we find that the first marital anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was at the Atonement of AD 30, three months after the Cana ceremony which appears to have been their own betrothal feast. Aspects of the Gospels though not always in agreement with each other can actually be followed outside the Bible; even the trial and crucifixion of Jesus are mentioned in the Annals of Imperial Rome.
We can now determine from chronological survey that the Crucifixion took place at the March Passover of AD 33, while the Bethany second marriage anointing was in the week prior to that.
We also know that, at that stage, Mary Magdalene had to have been three months pregnant - which means she should have given birth in September of AD If the Gospels are read as they are written, Jesus appears as a liberating dynast, endeavouring to unite the people of the region against the oppression of the Roman Empire.
The authorities were controlled by the military occupational force and resistance movements were a part of everyday life. Jesus was awaited, expected and, by the end of the Gospel story, had become an anointed Messiah.
While the Dead Sea Scrolls identify the Messiah as the supreme Military commander of Israel, the New Testament also makes it clear that the apostles were armed. Many of the high-ranking Jews in Jerusalem were quite content to hold positions of power backed by a foreign military regime. Apart from that, the Hebrew groups were sectarian and did not want to share their God Jehovah with anybody else, certainly not with unclean Gentiles Arabs and other non-Jews.
But there were other Jews - in particular the Nazarenes and Essenes , who were influenced by a more liberal, western doctrine. The sentencing of Jesus was by the Roman Governor, Pontius Pilate , but Jesus had actually been condemned and excommunicated prior to that by the Sanhedrin Council of Jewish elders. It was decided, however, to contrive a punishment whereby Jesus would be formally sentenced by Pilate, who was already trying other prisoners for leading insurrections against himself.
As recently confirmed by the Supreme Judge and Attorney General of Israel, it was quite illegal for the Sanhedrin Council to sit at night or to operate during the Passover - so the timing for committing Jesus to Roman law was perfect.
In civil and legal terms, Jesus was already dead when he was placed on the cross, prior to which he was denounced, scourged and prepared for death by decree excommunication. On that day he would be entombed buried alive , but during the first three days he could, in fact, be raised or resurrected, as he had predicted would be the case.
Raisings and resurrections apart from the fact that Jesus once flouted the rule with Lazarus could only be performed by the High Priest or by the Father of the Community. The High Priest at that time was Joseph Caiaphas the very man who condemned Jesus , therefore the raising had to be performed by the patriarchal Father.
Indeed, just like today, a common test for reflex action was scratching, prodding or pricking the skin with a sharp instrument. A surgeon of the British Medical Association recently stated: Blood flowing from a stab wound is evidence of life, not death.
In the event, it is blatantly apparent that Jesus survived. This is explicitly maintained in non-canonical Gospels and even the Islamic Koran confirms the fact in no uncertain terms. During that Friday afternoon when Jesus was on the Cross , there was a three-hour-forward time change. Time was recorded then by sundials and by priests who marked the hours by a sequence of measured prayer sessions. In essence, there were daytime hours and there were night-time hours.
From time to time, the beginning of daytime changed, as a result of which the beginning of night-time changed. We know from the Gospels that Joseph of Arimathea negotiated with Pontius Pilate to have Jesus removed from the cross after only a few hours of hanging, but the Gospels do not actually agree on the precise timing of events.
This is because of the notional time change, when three hours disappeared from the day, to be replaced with three night-time hours that is to say, daylight hours were substituted with hours of darkness. The Gospels explain that the land fell into darkness for three hours, which relates to our own split-second changing of clocks for daylight saving.
However, these three hours were the crux of everything that followed The Hebrew lunarists made their change during the daytime, but the solarists of which the Essenes and the Magi were factions did not make their change until midnight. This actually means that, according to the Mark Gospel which relates to Hebrew time , Jesus was crucified at the third hour, but in John which uses solar time he was crucified at the sixth hour.
It was those extra three hours which enabled them to work with Jesus during a period of time wherein others were not allowed to undertake any physical activity. And so we come to one of the most misunderstood events in the Bible - the Ascension. We know from Gospel chronology that the Bethany second-marriage anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was in the week before the Crucifixion at the time of the March Passover. Also that, at that stage, Mary was three-months pregnant and should, therefore, have given birth six months later.
So, what do the Gospels tell us about events in the notional month of September AD 33? In fact, they tell us nothing , but the story is taken up in the Acts of the Apostles , which detail for that month the event which we have come to know as the Ascension.
This was a tag established by way of a Roman Church doctrine more than three centuries later.
What the Bible text actually says is: It then continues, relating that a man in white said to the disciples: This same Jesus Not only were there rules to govern the marriage ceremony of a Messianic heir, but so too were there rules to govern the marriage itself.
The rules of dynastic wedlock were quite unlike the Jewish family norm, and Messianic parents were formally separated at the birth of a child.
Even prior to this, intimacy between a dynastic husband and wife was only allowed in December, so that births of heirs would always fall in the month of September - the month of Atonement , the holiest month of the calendar. And this was the reason why the Jews were split in opinion as to whether Jesus was, in fact, their true Messiah. When a dynastic child was conceived at the wrong time of year, the mother was generally placed in monastic custody for the birth so as to avoid public embarrassment.
In the case of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, however, the rules of wedlock had been obeyed to the letter, and their first child was properly conceived in December AD 32, to be born in September AD From the moment of a dynastic birth, the parents were physically separated - for six years if the child was a boy and for three years if the child was a girl.
This kingdom was actually the Essene high monastery at Mird , by the Dead Sea, and the ceremony of entry was conducted by the angelic priests under the supervision of the appointed Leader of the Pilgrims. So, if we now read the Acts verses as they were intended to be understood, we see that Jesus was taken up by the Cloud the Leader of the Pilgrims to the kingdom of heaven the high monastery , whereupon the man in white an angelic priest said that Jesus would return at the time of restitution when his earthly marriage was restored.
Paul actually tells of how Jesus was admitted to the priesthood of heaven when he actually had no entitlement to such a sacred office. He explains that Jesus was born through his father Joseph into the Davidic line of Judah - a line which held the right of kingship but had no right to priesthood, for this was the sole prerogative of the line of Aaron and Levi. As a result of this express change of the law, it is explained that Jesus was enabled to enter the kingdom of heaven in the priestly Order of Melchizedek.
There is no reference to this child being a son as there is for the two subsequent births and, given that Jesus returned three years later in AD 36 , we know that Mary must have had a daughter on this occasion. By following the chronology of the Acts, we see that in September AD 37 a second child was born , followed by another in AD The period from the first of these two births to the second restitution in AD 43 was six years, which denotes that the AD 37 child was a son.
This fact is also conveyed by the use of cryptic wording - the same cryptic wording afforded to the AD 44 child - so we know that this third child was also a son. Once these codes and allegories are understood, they never ever vary.
As Dr Thiering has pointed out, they mean the same thing every time they are used, and they are used every time that same meaning is required. Probably the most misrepresented book of the New Testament is the book of The Revelation of St John the Divine - misrepresented by the Church, that is, not by the book itself.
This book is quite unlike any other in the Bible. It is dubbed with terrible supernatural overtones and its straightforward imagery has been savagely corrupted by the Church to present the text as some form of foreboding or prophecy of warning.
So, what does the book reveal? Chronologically, its story follows the Acts of the Apostles and the book of The Revelation is, in fact, the continuing story of Jesus , Mary Magdalene and their sons - particularly the elder son, Jesus Justus. It follows his life and details his marriage, along with the birth of his own son.
This much misunderstood New Testament book is not a foreboding or a warning as the fearful Church would have us believe. It is precisely what it says it is: Jesus became an ordained fisher when he entered the Kingdom of Heaven, but until that time as explained by St Paul he held no priestly office.
In the rite of ordination, the officiating Levite priests of the Sanctuary would administer five loaves of bread and two fish to the candidates, but the law was very firm in that such candidates had to be circumcised Jews. Gentiles and uncircumcised Samaritans were on no account afforded any such privilege.
Indeed, it was this particular custom which Jesus had flouted at the so-called Feeding of the Five-thousand , when he presumed entitlement to his own liberal ministry by offering the loaves and fish to an unsanctified gathering. Apart from eventually becoming a fisher, Jesus was also referred to as the Christ - a Greek definition from Khristos which meant the King.
Prior to the birth of her second son in AD 44, Mary Magdalene was exiled from Judaea following a political uprising in which she was implicated. Her life and work in France, especially in Provence and the Languedoc region, appeared not only in works of European history but also in the Roman Church liturgy - until her story was suppressed by the Vatican.
It tells also of how the Roman authorities subsequently persecuted Mary, her son and his heirs: And behold, a great red dragon , having seven heads and seven crowns stood before the woman for to devour her child. And she brought forth a man-child. And the woman fled into the wilderness.
When translated into Latin, this became In Fortis , which was subsequently corrupted to Anfortas , the name of the key Fisher King in Grail romance. We can also consider graphic designs dating back well beyond the Dark Ages to about BC and, in doing this, we discover that a chalice or a cup was the longest-standing symbol of the female. Its representation was that of the Sacred Vessel - the vas uterus: And the name of this second son was Joseph.
The equivalent traditional symbol of the male was a blade or a horn, usually represented by a sword or a unicorn. Jesus the younger had previously been to England with Joseph of Arimathea at the age of twelve, in AD But who was Joseph of Arimathea - the man who assumed full control of affairs at the Crucifixion?
And from that time, portrayals of Joseph have shown him as being rather elderly at the Crucifixion, when Mother Mary was herself in her fifties. Prior to the Church announcement, however, the historical records of Joseph depicted a much younger man. He was recorded to have died at the age of 80 on 27 July AD 82, and would therefore have been aged 32 at the time of the Crucifixion.
In fact like Nazareth , the place later dubbed Arimathea never existed in those times. It therefore comes as no surprise that Joseph negotiated with Pilate to place Jesus in his own family tomb. They were the noted Merovingian Kings who founded the French monarchy and introduced the well-known fleur-de-lys the ancient gladiolus symbol of circumcision as the royal emblem of France.
From the Merovingian succession, another strain of the family established a wholly independent Jewish kingdom in southern France: Also, the early princes of Toulouse, Aquitaine and Provence were all descended in the Messianic bloodline.
Septimania was specifically granted to the Royal House of David in , and Prince Bernard of Septimania later married a daughter of Emperor Charlemagne. Also from the Fisher Kings came another important parallel line of succession in Gaul. Whereas the Merovingian Kings continued the patrilinear heritage of Jesus , this other line perpetuated the matrilinear heritage of Mary Magdalene.
They were the dynastic Queens of Avallon in Burgundy: Those familiar with Arthurian and Grail lore will by now have recognized the ultimate significance of this Messianic family: The descendant heirs of Jesus posed an enormous threat to the Roman High Church because they were the dynastic leaders of the true Nazarene Church. In real terms, the Roman Church should never have existed at all, for it was no more than a strategically designed hybrid movement comprised of various pagan doctrines attached to a fundamentally Judaeo-Christian base.
Jesus was born in 7 BC and his birthday was on the equivalent of 1 March, with an official royal birthday on 15 September to comply with dynastic regulation and the month of Atonement. Later, at the Synod of Whitby held in England in , the bishops also expropriated the Celtic festival of Easter Eostre , the Goddess of Spring and Fertility , and attached a wholly new Christian significance by aligning it with the Resurrection of Jesus.
In so doing, they actually changed the date of the old festival to sever its traditional association with the Jewish Passover. Christianity, as we know it, has evolved as a composite religion quite unlike any other.
If Jesus was its living catalyst, then Christianity should rightly be based on the teachings of Jesus himself - the moral and social codes of a fair-minded, tolerant ministry, with the people as its benefactors. There are a number of reasons for this, the foremost of which is that Jesus was deliberately sidestepped in favour of the alternative teachings of Peter and Paul: Only by removing Jesus from the front-line could the popes and cardinals reign supreme.
When formally instituting Christianity as the State religion of Rome, Constantine declared that he alone was the true Saviour Messiah - not Jesus! As for the Bishops of Rome the popes , they were granted a fabricated Apostolic descent from St Peter, since the legitimate Messianic descent from Jesus and his brothers was retained within the parallel Nazarene Church.
The only way for the Roman Church to restrain the heirs of Mary Magdalene was to discredit Mary herself and to deny her bridal relationship with Jesus.
He too had heirs, as did their other brothers, Simon, Joses and Jude. As a result, the bishops portrayed Mother Mary as a virgin and Mary Magdalene as a whore - neither of which description was mentioned in any original Gospel.
Over the course of time, these contrived doctrines have had widespread effect. But in the early days it took rather more to cement the ideas because the original women of the Nazarene mission had a significant following in the Celtic Church.
These women had all been disciples of Jesus and close friends of his mother, accompanying her to the Crucifixion, as confirmed in the Gospels. Hence, the Church declared that women were all heretics and sorceresses! In this, the bishops were aided by the words of Peter and Paul, and on the basis of their teachings the Roman Church was enabled to become wholly sexist. In his first Epistle to Timothy, Paul wrote: The Church Father Tertullian summed up the whole Roman attitude when writing about the emergent disciples of Mary Magdalene: How dare they!
They are brazen enough to teach, to engage in argument, to baptize. This was compiled as an imaginary conversation between the apostles after the Last Supper. Contrary to the Gospels, it supposed that Mary Magdalene had been present at the event, and it was agreed that the reason why Jesus had not passed any wine to Mary at the table was because he had seen her laughing! On the basis of this extraordinary, fictitious document, the bishops ruled that, even though Mary might have been a close companion of Jesus , women were not to be afforded any place within the Church because they were not serious!
But why has this sexist attitude persisted within the Church to the present day? Because Mary Magdalene had to be discredited and removed from the reckoning so that her heirs could be ignored. Notwithstanding the avid sexist movement, the Messianic heirs retained their social positions outside the Roman Church establishment. They were a constant threat to the Roman High Church and to the figurehead monarchs and governments empowered by that Church.
In fact, they were the very reason for the brutal Catholic Inquisition because they upheld a moral and social code which was contrary to High Church requirement.
This was especially apparent during the Age of Chivalry , which embraced a respect for womanhood, as exemplified by the Knights Templars whose constitutional oath supported a veneration of the Grail Mother, Queen Mary Magdalene. Prior to the Middle Ages, the individual stories of the Grail family were historically well known, but when the Church began its reign of fanatical persecution, the whole Nazarene and Desposynic heritage was forced underground.
But why did the vengeful persecutions begin at that particular time? These were, however, not just any churches - they were the greatest religious monuments ever to grace the skylines of the western world: Despite their present-day image, these impressive Gothic cathedrals had nothing whatever to do with the established Christian Church. This, of course, defeated every dogma that the High Church had encouraged, and the bishops retaliated by re-dedicating numerous other churches to Mary, the mother of Jesus.
It was at that time that Grail lore was itself denounced as a heresy by the Vatican.
The 6 th -century prophesies of Merlin were expressly banned by the Ecumenical Council, and the original Nazarene Church of Jesus became an underground stream, aided by such notable sponsors as Leonardo da Vinci and Sandro Botticelli.
In those days, the Church policed and controlled most literature in the public domain and so, in order to avoid outright censorship, the Grail tradition became allegorical and its message was communicated by way of secret watermarks, esoteric writings, Tarot cards and symbolic artwork.
But why should Grail lore and the prophesies of Merlin have posed such a problem for the Roman Church? Because, within the context of their adventurous texts, they told the descendant story of the Grail bloodline - a bloodline which had been ousted from its dynastic position by the Bishops of Rome who had elected to reign supreme by way of a contrived apostolic succession.
Peter was never a Bishop of Rome - nor of anywhere else for that matter! From the s, the powerful Knights Templars and their cathedrals posed an enormous threat to the male-only Church by bringing the heritage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene to the fore in the public domain. The cardinals knew that their whole establishment would tumble if the Messianic descendants gained the upper hand.
They had to be crushed - and so the brutal Inquisition was implemented: This was the home of the Cathars the Pure Ones , who were said to be the guardians of a great and sacred treasure -a mysterious secret which could overturn orthodox Christianity. In , the main thrust of the Inquisition or Holy Office as it was called was instituted by Pope Gregory IX during the course of the Languedoc massacre, and it was set against anyone who supported the Grail heresy.
By the torture of victims was formally authorized, along with execution by burning. Heresy was a wonderful charge to level against captives, because only the Church could define it. The victims were tortured until they confessed and, having confessed, they were executed. If they did not confess, then the torture continued until they died anyway.
One recorded form of torture was to spread the victim with fat, and then to roast him alive upwards from the feet over an open fire. These savage persecutions and tortures were openly waged for more than years, to be extended against Jews, Muslims and Protestant dissenters. But the Catholic Inquisition was never formally terminated.
As recently as it was renamed the Sacred Congregation and its powers are theoretically still in force today. Undaunted by the Inquisition , the Nazarene movement pursued its own course, and the story of the bloodline was perpetuated in literature such as the Grand Saint Grail and the High History of the Holy Grail. These writings were largely sponsored by the Grail courts of France the courts of Champagne, Anjou and others and also by the Knights Templars and the Desposyni.
In the course of this, Arthurian romance became a popular vehicle for the Grail tradition.
The papal armies scoured Europe for the Templar documents and treasure but, like the Cathar inheritance, nothing was found. Nevertheless, many Knights were tortured and executed in the process.
In all this, however, the Templar hoard was not lost and, while the Vatican emissaries were searching, the treasure and documents were locked away in the Chapter House Treasury vaults of Paris. They were under the protection of the Templar Grand Knights - those styled the Guardian Princes of the Royal Secret - who loaded the hoard one night onto 18 galleys of the Templar fleet at La Rochelle.
By daybreak, the ships had set sail for various destinations - notably Portugal and Scotland. The latter were welcomed, upon their arrival, by King Robert the Bruce who, along with the whole Scottish nation, had been excommunicated by the Pope for challenging the Catholic King Edward of England. But, why was it that King Arthur , a Celtic commander of the 6 th century, was so important to the Knights Templars and the Grail courts of Europe?
Quite simply, because Arthur had been unique, with a dual heritage in the Messianic line. King Arthur was by no means mythical , as many have supposed, but he has generally been looked for in the wrong places. Researchers, misguided by the fictional locations of the romances, have searched in vain through the chronicles of Brittany, Wales and the West of England. He was indeed the High King of the Celtic Isle and was the sovereign commander of the British troops in the late 6 th century. Arthur was born in and died in battle in It is for this reason that the stories of Arthur and Joseph of Arimathea are so closely entwined in the Grail romances.
By the 6 th century, Messianic descendants had founded Desposynic kingdoms in Wales and across the Strathclyde and Cambrian regions of Britain. This, of course, infuriated the Roman bishops because they claimed the sole right to appoint kings who, according to them, were supposed to be crowned by the Pope! As a direct result of this coronation, Saint Augustine was eventually sent from Rome to dismantle the Celtic Church when St Columba died in He proclaimed himself Archbishop of Canterbury three years later, but his overall mission failed and the Nazarene tradition persisted in Scotland , Ireland , Wales and across the breadth of northern England.
An important fact to remember is that the Grail dynasts were never territorial governors of lands. Like Jesus himself, they were designated guardians of the people. It was this implicitly social concept which the High Church found so difficult to overcome, for the bishops preferred to have dominion over territorial kings who were authorized by the Pope.
Only by maintaining ultimate spiritual control over individuals could the Church reign supreme, and so whenever a Grail dynast came to the fore he was met by the wrath of the papal machine. In the bishops managed to depose the Merovingian succession in Gaul, and they established a new tradition whereby kings of the Carolingian succession that of Charlemagne had to be approved and crowned by the Pope.
But the Church could never topple the Desposynic lines in Scotland, even though the old Celtic kingdoms of England had been dismantled by Germanic Anglo-Saxons from the 6 th century. The underlying principle of the Grail monarchs was always one of Service, in accordance with the Messianic code. Hence, they were kings and common fathers of their realms, but they were never rulers.
This key aspect of the Grail Code was perpetuated at the very heart of nursery tale and folklore. Never did a valiant cardinal or bishop ride to the aid of an oppressed subject or a damsel in distress, for this has always been the social realm of Grail princes and their appointed knights.
The Grail Code recognizes advancement by merit and acknowledges community structure, but above all it is entirely democratic.
Whether apprehended in its physical or spiritual dimension, the Grail belongs to leaders and followers alike. It also belongs to the land and the environment, requiring that all should be as one in a mutually unified Service. Throughout the ages, parliaments and governments have had as much trouble as the Church in confronting the Messianic social code, and the position is no different today.
Presidents and prime ministers are elected by the people. They are supposed to represent the people - but do they? In actual fact, they do not. They are always affiliated to a political party and they achieve their positions by way of majority party vote. But not everybody takes the trouble to vote and sometimes there are more than two parties to vote for. Consequently, at any given time, more than half the people of a nation may not be represented by the political party in power. In this regard, even though a majority vote has been applied, the democratic principle fails.
Jesus confronted a very similar situation in the 1 st century. But who represented the people? The people were not Romans; they were Holy Land Jews: Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes and the like. Apart from that, there were large numbers of Samaritans and Gentiles non-Jews; the Arab races. Who represented them? This was the beginning of the Grail code of non-affiliated princely service: The Grail code is based on the principles of liberty, fraternity and equality, and it was particularly apparent in the American and French Revolutions, both of which discarded the lordship of despotic aristocracy.
But what has replaced it? It has been replaced by party politics and largely non-representative government. Many people have asked me why the hitherto suppressed information in Bloodline of the Holy Grail is coming to light at this particular time. The fact is that the information has never been suppressed by those whom it concerns. It has been suppressed by outside power-seekers who have sought to serve their own interests, rather than serve the communities they are supposed to represent.
Today, however, we are in a new age of questing as many people grow more disillusioned with the establishment dogmas that prevail. It is a journey of discovery through past ages, with its eye set firmly on the future.
In this present age of computer technology, satellite tele-communications and an international space industry, scientific advancement takes place at an alarming rate. With each stage of development arriving ever more quickly, the functionally competent will emerge as the survivors, while the rest will be considered unfit by an impetuous establishment that serves its own ambitions but not its subjects.
So, what has all this to do with the Grail? The Grail has many guises and many attributes - as will be revealed. Yet, in whatever form it is portrayed, the Grail quest is governed by an overriding desire for honest achievement.
It is the route by which all can survive among the fit, for it is the key to harmony and unity at every social and natural station. The Grail Code recognizes advancement by merit, and acknowledges community structure - but above all things it is entirely democratic.
Whether apprehended in its physical or its spiritual dimension, the Grail belongs to leaders and followers alike, enjoining that all should be as one in a common, unified service. In order to be numbered among the fit, it is necessary to be fully informed.
Only through awareness can preparation be made for the future. Dictatorial rule is not a route to information; it is a positive constraint designed to prevent free access to the truth.